Articles
28 May 2025

S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
113
Views
52
Downloads

Authors

The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is widely used to evaluate psoriatic disease activity in clinical settings; however, its limitations hinder its practicality in routine use. The Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Severity (S-MAPA) has emerged as a promising tool addressing these limitations, providing a more feasible approach for assessing disease severity. This study aimed to evaluate the S-MAPA as a sensitive and practical alternative to existing instruments for measuring psoriasis severity. Patients with psoriasis were assessed using body surface area (BSA), the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), S-MAPA, PASI, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels were also measured. Spearman’s correlation analysis compared the relationships between these assessment tools and hs-CRP levels. In total, 100 assessments were conducted between January and July 2019. The S-MAPA score and PASI showed a strong positive correlation with disease severity (r=0.9315, p<0.01). Both the S-MAPA score and PASI exhibited comparable correlations with hs-CRP levels (r=0.5299 vs. 0.5316) and the DLQI (r=0.2533 vs. 0.2641). The S-MAPA score demonstrated stronger correlations with the PASI, DLQI, and hs-CRP level than with BSA or the PGA score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the S-MAPA was 0.9787, with an optimal cut-off value of 138 for predicting severe psoriasis (sensitivity, 92.59%; specificity, 95.89%). Based on our findings, the S-MAPA is a reliable and practical alternative for assessing the severity of psoriasis in clinical practice, offering advantages over conventional measures.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Puzenat E, Bronsard V, Prey S, et al. What are the best outcome measures for assessing plaque psoriasis severity? A systematic review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24:10-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03562.x
2. Spuls PI, Lecluse LL, Poulsen M-LN, et al. How good are clinical severity and outcome measures for psoriasis?: quantitative evaluation in a systematic review. J Invest Dermatol 2010;130:933-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2009.391
3. Van de Kerkhof P. On the limitations of the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI). Br J Dermatol 1992;126:205-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb07827.x
4. Walsh JA, Arledge T, Nurminen T, et al. PGA× BSA: a measure of psoriasis severity tested in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and treated with certolizumab pegol. Journal Rheumatol 2018;45:922-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170244
5. Walsh JA, McFadden M, Woodcock J, et al. Product of the Physician Global Assessment and body surface area: a simple static measure of psoriasis severity in a longitudinal cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol 2013;69:931-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.040
6. Chiesa Fuxench ZC, Callis Duffin K, Siegel M, et al. Validity of the Simple-Measure for Assessing Psoriasis Activity (S-MAPA) for objectively evaluating disease severity in patients with plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015;73:868-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.001
7. Boehncke WH. Systemic Inflammation and Cardiovascular Comorbidity in Psoriasis Patients: Causes and Consequences. Front Immunol 2018;9:579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00579
8. Feldman SR, Krueger GG. Psoriasis assessment tools in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64 Suppl 2:ii65-8; discussion ii9-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.031237
9. Langley RG, Ellis CN. Evaluating psoriasis with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Psoriasis Global Assessment, and Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;51:563-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.04.012
10. Carlin CS, Feldman SR, Krueger JG, et al. A 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) is a clinically significant endpoint in the assessment of psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004;50:859-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.09.014
11. Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994;19:210-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x
12. Hongbo Y, Thomas CL, Harrison MA, et al. Translating the science of quality of life into practice: What do dermatology life quality index scores mean? J Invest Dermatol 2005;125:659-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23621.x
13. Şener G, İnan Yuksel E, Gökdeniz O, et al. The Relationship of Hematological Parameters and C-reactive Protein (CRP) With Disease Presence, Severity, and Response to Systemic Therapy in Patients With Psoriasis. Cureus 2023;15:e43790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43790
14. Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012;24:69-71.
15. Naldi L, Svensson A, Diepgen T, et al. Randomized clinical trials for psoriasis 1977–2000: the EDEN survey. J Invest Dermatol 2003;120:738-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12145.x
16. Duffin KC, Papp KA, Bagel J, et al. Evaluation of the Physician Global Assessment and Body Surface Area Composite Tool for Assessing Psoriasis Response to Apremilast Therapy: Results from ESTEEM 1 and ESTEEM 2. J Drugs Dermatol 2017;16:147-53.
17. Merola JF, Gottlieb AB. Practical assessment of psoriasis clinical severity in both clinical trials and clinical practice settings: a report from the GRAPPA 2016 annual meeting. J Rheumatol 2017;44:691-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170147
18. Kural BV, Örem A, Çimşit G, et al. Evaluation of the atherogenic tendency of lipids and lipoprotein content and their relationships with oxidant–antioxidant system in patients with psoriasis. Clin Chim Acta 2003;328:71-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00373-X
19. Mallbris L, Granath F, Hamsten A, Ståhle M. Psoriasis is associated with lipid abnormalities at the onset of skin disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;54:614-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.11.1079
20. Vadakayil AR, Dandekeri S, Kambil SM, Ali NM. Role of C-reactive protein as a marker of disease severity and cardiovascular risk in patients with psoriasis. Indian Dermatol Online J 2015;6:322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5178.164483
21. Kimball AB, Wu Y. Cardiovascular disease and classic cardiovascular risk factors in patients with psoriasis. Int J Dermatol 2009;48:1147-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.04075.x
22. Barrea L, Macchia PE, Tarantino G, et al. Nutrition: A key environmental dietary factor in clinical severity and cardio-metabolic risk in psoriatic male patients evaluated by 7-day food-frequency questionnaire. J Transl Med 2015;13:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0658-y
23. Uaratanawong R, Uaratanawong S, Chunhasewee C, Chawvavanich P. High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level and Psoriasis Severity in Thai Patients. J Med Assoc Thai 2016;99:1039-45.
24. Coimbra S, Oliveira H, Reis F, et al. C‐reactive protein and leucocyte activation in psoriasis vulgaris according to severity and therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010;24:789-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03527.x

How to Cite



S-MAPA: bridging the gap in psoriasis severity assessment. (2025). Dermatology Reports. https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2025.10231