Economic analysis and time monitoring of pediatric venipuncture procedures; audio-visual distraction and Buzzy® device versus standard care: protocol of an interventional randomized controlled trial

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Background: reducing anxiety and pain during an invasive procedure like venipuncture is crucial for preventing the onset of stress and making the nurse’s procedures faster and smoother. Distraction techniques appear to be a viable solution. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different distraction methods in terms of cost-effectiveness and time to perform venipuncture in a hospital setting. Materials and Methods: a randomized, controlled, interventional-blinded 3-arm parallel-group study with inpatients aged 3 to 18 years old, awake and conscious, at the first venipuncture attempt and only after children and parents signed informed consent. The pain rating scales Wong-Baker FACES, Numerical Rating Scale, and Children’s Fear Scale will be used. Conclusions: pediatric pain is a challenge for medical professionals as well as a health need that must be addressed rapidly. It is crucial to assess and apply the most effective methods for adequate analgesia in shorter periods, while also reducing healthcare costs.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.