Articolo di Review(s)
13 febbraio 2024

Biobanking e Project Management

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
253
Visite
104
Downloads

Autori

Obiettivi: la crescita della standardizzazione è parallela e correlata alla complessità architettonica del sistema organizzato di ogni biobanca. La gestione di tale complessità, da cui si originano scenari variegati, richiede metodologie di lavoro precise. Questo articolo evidenzia la natura delle biobanche di nuova generazione e riassume i concetti portanti l’impalcatura di Project Management. Metodi: la metodologia utilizzata per la raccolta dei dati necessari alla produzione del working paper è una revisione narrativa e di meta-sintesi della letteratura inerente alle aree di qualità, economia e coinvolgimento sociale delle biobanche e delle più recenti metodologie di Project Management. Risultati: le biobanche di nuova generazione possiedono una struttura polivalente principalmente riconoscibile nelle tre macroaree “Quality Management”, “Business Management” e “Social Engagement Management”, necessaria per garantire la sostenibilità delle stesse, ovvero il proprio ciclo di vita. Conclusioni: il Project Management, attraverso la sua impalcatura concettuale ed i modelli che offre, può rappresentare lo strumento più adeguato alla gestione della complessità che caratterizza la struttura delle biobanche, permettendo un approccio organizzato, strutturato ed integrato, sia per perseguire l’implementazione del processo di standards normativi sia per la gestione delle macroaree di ogni biobanca con relativi processi, fasi, sottoprocessi, sottofasi ed attività.

Altmetrics

Downloads

La data di download non è ancora disponibile.

Citations

OECD.Stat. 2006. Statistiche OCSE. Available from: https://stats.oecd.org/
Kinkorová J. Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: Objectives, challenges, and innovation. The EPMA Journal. 2016;7:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13167-016-0053-7
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016;533:7604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
Pétavy F, Seigneuret N, Hudson LD, et al. 2019. The Turning Point for Clinical Research: Global Data Standardization. Applied Clinical Trials. Available from: https://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/view/turning-point-clinical-research-global-data-standardization
ISO. 2018. ISO 20387:2018. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/67888.html
Simeon-Dubach D, Watson P. Biobanking 3.0: Evidence based and customer focused biobanking. Clinical Biochemistry. 2014;47:300-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.018
Gottweis H, Zatloukal K. Biobank governance: Trends and perspectives. Pathobiology: Journal of Immunopathology, Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2007;74:206-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000104446
Dagher G. Quality matters: International standards for biobanking. Cell Proliferation. 2022;55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13282
Riegman PHJ, Becker KF, Zatloukal K, et al. How standardization of the pre-analytical phase of both research and diagnostic biomaterials can increase reproducibility of biomedical research and diagnostics. New Biotechnology. 2019;53:35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2019.06.007
Vaught J, Rogers J, Carolin T, Compton C. Biobankonomics: Developing a Sustainable Business Model Approach for the Formation of a Human Tissue Biobank. JNCI Monographs, Oxford Academic, UK. 2011. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jncimono/article/2011/42/24/935966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgr009
Clément B, Yuille M, Zaltoukal K, et al. (Public biobanks: Calculation and recovery of costs. Science Translational Medicine. 2014;6:261fs45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010444
Lemke AA, Wu JT, Waudby C, et al. Community engagement in biobanking: Experiences from the eMERGE Network. Genomics, society, and policy. 2010;6:50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-6-3-50
Mayrhofer M. 2008. Patient organizations as the (un)usual suspects. The biobanking activities of the Association Française contre les Myopathies and its Généthon DNA and Cell Bank. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203927991-7/patient-organizations-un-usual-suspects-michaela-mayrhofer
Mitchell D, Geissler J, Parry-Jones A, et al. Biobanking from the patient perspective. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2015;1:4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-015-0001-z
Henning CHCA, Wald A. Toward a wiser projectification: Macroeconomic effects of firm-level project work. International Journal of Project Management. 2019;37:807-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.002
Association for Project Management (APM). 2022. What is project management? Available from: https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/what-is-project-management/
Project Management Institute (PMI). 2023. What is project management? Available from: https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management
Capaldo G, Volpe A. Project Management. Principi e metodi. McGraw-Hill Education; New York, USA. 2021.
de Carvalho MM, Patah LA, de Souza Bido D. Project management and its effects on project success: Cross-country and cross-industry comparisons. International Journal of Project Management. 2015;33:1509-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.04.004
Abbott KW, Snidal DJ. The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: The Spectrum of International Institutions. Routledge; Abingdon, UK. 2021.

Come citare



Biobanking e Project Management . (2024). Working Paper of Public Health, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/wpph.2023.9768